WEAC officials trying to limit voter choices in possible recall election

Union bosses reportedly tried to strong-arm Milwaukee mayor out of the race 

By Steve Gunn
EAG Communications

     MILWAUKEE – Leaders of the Wisconsin Education Association Council apparently believe they – and not the voters – should have the final say on who governs the state.
    
     They certainly showed little respect for the will of the voters last year. Gov. Scott Walker received 52 percent of the vote in the 2010 general election, indicating a mandate from the people of Wisconsin.
    
     Yet the union didn’t hesitate to go to court to try and block the implementation of Act 10, Walker’s centerpiece legislation. And WEAC leaders didn’t hesitate to start a recall campaign against Walker as soon as the calendar would legally allow it.
    
     The people of Wisconsin chose a governor, and WEAC obviously couldn’t care less.
    
     Now union leaders are trying to control who’s on the ballot in the possible recall election. According to the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, WEAC President Mary Bell and others recently met with Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett and tried to convince him to stay out of the possible gubernatorial race.
    
     Bell and her cohorts apparently want to clear the field for their chosen candidate, former Dane County Executive Kathleen Falk. That’s not surprising, since Falk appears to be the kind of union puppet that WEAC would love to have in the governor’s office.
    
     If you recall, Falk was among those who filed lawsuits last spring to prevent the state from implementing Act 10. As Dane County Executive, it was never clear why she spent public time concerning herself with a state issue, but Bell and the other union bosses obviously thought it was a grand gesture.
    
     Bell and company certainly have a right to back the candidate of their choice. But is it right for the union leaders to try to strong-arm other candidates off the Democratic primary ballot? Shouldn’t citizens who like Barrett have the right to vote for him if they choose? Should that right be eliminated due to political pressure from a multi-million dollar special interest group?

Barrett’s too independent for WEAC Read More »

Posted in Daily Updates | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Promising Wisconsin charter proposal suffocated by defenders of the education establishment

By Steve Gunn
EAG Communications
 
     MADISON, Wis. – For years thousands of minority students have struggled in the Madison public school system.
 
     In 2010, for example, 87 percent of white students graduated on schedule, compared to only 48 percent of black students.
    
     So the Urban League of Greater Madison proposed the establishment of a new charter school – Madison Preparatory Academy – to serve as an alternative for kids whose academic needs are not being met in traditional public schools.
 
     Unfortunately, Wisconsin state law says most new charter schools must gain the permission of local school boards to open. And many school boards, along with their still very influential teachers unions, are cynical about opening new schools that will compete for students and the state dollars that follow them.
 
     That regulation ended up killing Madison Prep before it got off the ground.
 
     Just before Christmas the Madison School Board, yielding to pressure from the local teachers union, voted 5-2 to reject Madison Prep’s application to open two schools next fall, one for boys and one for girls.
    
     That means thousands of minority students will continue to be stuck in sub-par neighborhood schools, despite the fact that many are learning little or nothing. That makes little difference to the school board and union, because they will get to keep the state money tied to those students, without any competitive pressure to better serve them.
 
     The education establishment won again. Students, parents and taxpayers are the losers.
 
     The Madison Prep tragedy underscores the need for Wisconsin lawmakers to consider a bill currently in the legislature that would create a new statewide entity to approve and govern new charter schools, without the interference of local school boards or teachers unions.
 
     Until such a law is passed, Wisconsin charter schools that manage to open will remain a shadow of what they could be.
    
Jumping through bureaucratic hoops Read More »
Posted in Daily Updates, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Is Las Vegas teachers union risking 1,000 jobs to preserve its profitable insurance company?

   LAS VEGAS – While the Great Recession has affected almost all Americans, Nevadans may be the hardest hit. The state leads the nation in unemployment (13 percent) and home foreclosures (three times the national average).

   Because of the faltering economy and slowed tax revenue, the Clark County School District needs to cut $78 million from its budget over the next two years. The district must do this either by freezing teacher pay and finding a more affordable employee health insurance carrier, or by laying off 1,000 educators as early as next month.

   The first alternative is obviously preferable, because students would be adversely affected by larger class sizes and the loss of many enthusiastic young teachers. Unfortunately the second option may be unavoidable, because the district has been unable to negotiate a new contract with its teachers union, the Clark County Education Association (CCEA).

  CCSD is the fifth largest school district in the nation, serving around 310,000 students in 340 schools in and around Las Vegas. The district is also the largest employer in Nevada with some 33,000 employees, 18,000 of which are teachers.

   The main sticking point seems to be the district’s desire to find a less expensive health insurance provider. CCEA members currently receive health insurance from the Teachers Health Trust, a company ironically owned and operated by their union.

   Most people would describe the union’s insistence on selling its own company’s expensive insurance product to the school district as a conflict of interest, but union officials either don’t agree or don’t care.

   The teachers union declared a bargaining impasse last summer. While the two sides could conceivably still reach a deal, it seems most likely that an arbitrator will make the final decision about wage freezes and the fate of the union-owned insurance company. The arbiter is legally bound to choose one side over the other.

   “There’s no middle ground,” said district spokeswoman Amanda Fulkerson. “If the district wins, no layoffs and a pay freeze. If the union wins, some get raises, and others get laid off.”

Is the union protecting Health Trust?

   The question must be asked: Why is the teachers union jeopardizing the careers and financial futures of 1,000 of its members?   Read More »

Posted in Daily Updates | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Florida’s false choice: Taxpayers being duped into choosing between education and medical care

     TALAHASSEE, Fla. – What’s happened to Florida Gov. Rick Scott?
 
     When Scott took office earlier this year, he wasted no time establishing himself as a bold education reformer by placing limits on teacher tenure, basing teacher pay on student achievement, and increasing the number of charter schools.
    
     Scott deserves credit for getting those reforms across the finish line, but he seems to have lost his nerve for bold action in the current fight over school funding.
    
    Instead of explaining to taxpayers how Florida’s public school budgets are being overrun by special interest labor unions, Scott is sounding like a spokesman for the Florida Education Association, telling lawmakers he will “not sign a budget … that does not significantly increase state funding for education.”
    
     Scott says he wants to “invest” – a favorite union buzzword – a billion more dollars into public education, and would pay for it by cutting $2 billion in Medicaid reimbursements to hospitals.
    
     State Democrats wasted little time in framing Scott’s proposal as “school books versus seniors.” That’s a pretty harsh but nonetheless accurate analysis.
    
     Scott is buying into (and selling) the faulty premise that Florida’s public schools are being underfunded by taxpayers. Instead, the governor’s focus should be on how school employee unions divert millions of dollars away from classrooms and into expensive, goodie-filled labor contracts that benefit adult employees at the expense of students.
    
       And there are far too many employee unions sucking too much money from Florida school budgets.
    
       In addition to teacher unions, Florida’s public schools are awash in unions for custodians, mechanics, daycare workers, bus drivers, bus aides, security personnel, office personnel, interpreters for deaf students, groundskeepers, painters, plumbers, carpenters, delivery personnel – the list seems endless.
    
     An EAG investigation found that Florida’s 10 largest school districts use 117 unique salary schedules – as defined in collectively bargained contracts – to pay non-instructional employees. These salary schedules guarantee employees an automatic pay raise every year, whether their districts can afford it or not.
    
     In addition to automatic raises, many union contracts contain dozens of costly provisions for things like free or low-cost health insurance, free or low-cost pension plans and generous reimbursement for unused sick or personal days. The contractual perks cause school labor budgets to balloon as state aid continues to decrease.
    
     Earlier this year, the St. Petersburg Times reported that payouts for unused sick days cost the Miami-Dade County school district around $20 million and the Pinellas County district nearly $10 million. 
    
     As a result, low-seniority teachers are laid off, academic programs are cut and extracurricular activities wither away. The schools certainly have a money problem, but it’s not due to a lack of revenue. It has more to do with their bad habit of paying too much for labor and spending too little on kids.
    
     Instead of offering false budget choices of “hospitals or schools,” Gov. Scott would do well to educate Florida citizens about how the unions have turned public school budgets into their private financial playground.
    
The Santa Rosa model 
    
     Some Florida schools have managed to weather the financial storm on their own by tackling runaway labor costs.
    
     The Santa Rosa district is a good example. Like most districts, it has felt the effects of decreased state aid. Santa Rosa’s current operating budget is about $15 million less than last year’s budget.  
    
     But school officials did not have to hit the panic button, or demand tax increases to maintain their programs. Instead they made some “tough decisions,” including the privatization of their food, custodial and transportation programs, a gradual process that began in the 1990s.
    
     “(The tough decisions) are paying dividends because we are very solvent and we are able to navigate through the next year without too much concern,” Superintendent Tim Wyrosdick recently told NWFDailyNews.com.
    
     Jim Crane, director of purchasing and contract administration for Santa Rosa schools, helped implement the district’s privatization plan, which was among the first in the state. He’s seen the benefits of privatization first hand.
    
     “We’re saving millions per year because we contracted out, and we’re getting better service,” Crane told EAG. “It’s been a net plus for us.”
    
     Crane notes the district’s switch to privatization was very gradual. Instead of replacing union employees with private sector counterparts immediately, Santa Rosa decided to replace employees through attrition. As they quit or retire, they’re replaced with contracted workers.
    
     Eighteen years ago, two-thirds of Santa Rosa’s custodial staff were district employees, and were paid according to contractually negotiated salary schedules. That’s down to two percent today. 
    
     When salary and benefits are averaged out, a custodian employed directly by the district costs twice as much as a privately contracted custodian, Crane said. District-employed transportation employees cost one-third more than their private sector counterparts.
    
     Privatization hasn’t solved all of Santa Rosa’s financial woes. The district has been forced to lay off teachers over the past few years. But it would be in much worse shape without the moves.
    
     Crane said districts should consider privatization, but warns “it’s not a panacea either.”
    
     “Successful privatization doesn’t just happen,” he said. “It takes a district working closely with a contractor. It requires a partnership.”  
    
Charter school spending focused on students
    
     Tim Kitts is the founding principal of Bay Haven Charter Academy, which educates 2,000 students in five charter schools in Florida.
    
     Charter schools receive about 10 percent less funding than traditional public schools, making state budget cuts even more difficult to absorb. Bay Haven charters have been forced to tighten their budgets, but they’ve never done it at the expense of students.
    
     BHCA has consolidated and cut administrative and clerical positions in order to balance its budget, but it has not made any cuts to the teaching or paraprofessional staff.
    
     “Any position that has direct contact with kids – teachers, paraprofessionals, intervention specialists – we’ve kept intact,” Kitts said. “We’ve kept our commitment to academics and to the fine arts.”
    
     Kitts noted that BCHA’s teachers, food service workers and bus drivers are all employees of the academy, and none of them are unionized. That means labor costs are lower and more money is available for instruction.
    
     When asked if his peers at traditional public schools care envious of Bay Haven’s lack of employee unions, Kitts replied, “That would be an understatement.”
    
     “In traditional schools, employees think they have a right to a guaranteed career. It’s hard for people to break that mental cycle,” Kitts said.
    
     Kitts believes the schools’ management and staff work cooperatively, with the understanding that the schools exist to serve the students, not the adults.
    
     “Like parents and students, our employees choose to come here,” he said.
    
Posted in Daily Updates | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

School board denies Madison Prep, leaving minority students with limited options

Five board members bow to the objections of the self-serving teachers union
      
By Steve Gunn
EAG Communications
   
     MADISON – The Madison teachers union scored a major victory Monday night, when the Madison school board voted 5-2 to deny an application to open a new charter school designed for struggling minority youths.
    
     The children and families of the community were the losers.
     
     For months, officials at the Urban League of Greater Madison, the driving force behind the proposed Madison Preparatory Academy, have been jumping through countless hoops to please the school board and gain permission to open the new charter next fall.
    
     They had to convince state officials that single-sex schools (in this case one for boys and one for girls) were effective and legal. They tried to overcome fears about the amount of money the new school would siphon from the district by securing private grants. They tried to work around an unfair requirement that would have forced them to hire union teachers and greatly increase their costs.
     
     They did all this because they desperately wanted to provide an alternative school for minority students who have traditionally underachieved in Madison public schools. They wanted to create a school environment sharply focused on academic achievement, with a longer school day and a non-union staff.
    
     But their noble efforts proved to be for naught.
    
     With the defeat of the Madison Prep proposal, they see children being trapped indefinitely by an education establishment that wants to maintain a guaranteed clientele of students, even if they are not learning.
    
     “For the past 20 years, our schools have been ablaze with failure and we have been unable to extinguish the fire,” Neil Gleason, a retired state employee and former union president, was quoted by the Wisconsin State Journal as telling the school board at Monday’s meeting. “Madison will forever remember seven names and seven votes cast here tonight.”
     
     For the record, the five board members who voted to kill Madison Prep were Beth Moss, Arlene Silveira, Marj Passman, Maya Cole and Ed Hughes. Voting for the school were board President James Howard and Lucy Mathiak.
    
Charters at the mercy of school boards
    
          Unfortunately a very flawed state law requires most new charter schools to gain the permission of local school boards to open. Some school boards, fearful of the loss of students and the state money that comes with them, oppose charter schools and keep kids trapped in existing schools.
    

     We have to wonder if all or most of the school board members who voted against Madison Prep have strong political and financial ties to the teachers union.     

     The union wasn’t about to support a proposed charter school that sought independent status, so it could be self-governing and hire non-union teachers. If the union can’t collect dues from newly hired teachers, it will do everything in its power to keep them from being hired.
    
     Of the hundreds of people who spoke on the issue at Monday’s meeting, the vast majority of the opponents present were “mostly Madison teachers,” according to the Wisconsin State Journal. Surprise, surprise.
    
     Last night’s vote is a sickening reminder of the grip that the failed education establishment still has on the public school system. Wisconsin desperately needs reform that would allow charter schools to open without the permission of local school boards (and their unions), and operate independently of those boards.
    
     That would be a huge step toward providing the type of school choice that all students and families deserve.
    
Reformers may run for the board
 
     After Monday’s meeting, Urban League President Kaleem Claire threatened to file a racial discrimination lawsuit against the district. We’re lukewarm on that idea. As much as we abhor the school board decision, we shudder at the thought of any court overturning the decision of elected officials.
    
     But Claire also came up with an idea we can heartily embrace. He urged supporters of Madison Prep to run for the school board in an effort to decrease the power and influence of the Madison education establishment.
    
     For too long, local teachers unions have funded and campaigned for their handpicked school board candidates, in a blatant effort to basically hire their own bosses. We imagine that tendency is particularly strong in a pro-union city like Madison.
    
     At least one Madison Prep supporter, Mary Burke, has already announced her intention to run for the board next spring. Burke, a retired business executive and former state commerce secretary, recently pledged $2.5 million to Madison Prep and expressed her desire to see the school open on schedule.
    
     While we do not endorse candidates, we believe Burke and others like her would bring a fresh perspective to the school board while making it more accountable to citizens and less beholden to unions.
    
ROCKETSHIP UPDATE
 
     Last month we reported about the Milwaukee Common Council’s vote to allow California-based Rocketship Education, a charter school company, to open one publicly-funded school in the city in 2013. The company hopes to open a total of eight K-5 schools in the city by 2017.
    
     We also shared the contents of a document forwarded to us, illustrating the opposition of some local teachers union members to the Rocketship proposal. As one wrote, “It’s time to say enough is enough! Milwaukee has more school choice for parents than most cities in the country.”
    
     Apparently several school boards in Santa Clara County, California felt the same way. They fought a proposal to allow Rocketship to open 20 new charter schools in Santa Clara County, arguing that they, the school boards, should have the power to approve or disapprove the establishment of charter schools.
    
     Sounds just like Madison, doesn’t it?
    
     But parents and students were the winners in this fight. After hearing dozens of parents plead for more and better education options, the Santa Clara County Board of Education voted 5-2 last week to allow the 20 new schools to open.
    
     Rocketship already operates five schools in San Jose, with several more slated to open next year. The company said its proposal to open 20 new schools was based on overwhelming public demand, according to a local newspaper report.
    
     Rocketship schools in San Jose have reportedly posted impressive test scores for students who have traditionally struggled, the news report said. That’s in contrast to many traditional public schools in Santa Clara County, which are clearly underperforming.
    
     A total of 97 schools in the county, serving roughly 40,000 students, have been performing below state standards on the California Academic Performance Index, the news report said.
    
     “I am very sad to see the low level of education my children got,” resident Maria Gomez was quoted as telling the county board of education. Her son transferred to a Rocketship school last year and reportedly made more than a year’s progress in reading skill in three months, according to the report.
    
     “Rocketship has shown what works,” San Jose Mayor Chuck Reed was quoted as telling the board. “Let’s take it, let’s replicate it.”
    
     Apparently parents in Milwaukee can look forward to the arrival of at least one new charter school with a proven record of success, and perhaps several more in coming years. The local teachers union might feel like “enough is enough,” but when it comes to quality education options, we’re willing to bet most parents believe there is no such thing as enough.
    
SHEBOYGAN HANDBOOK LOOKS PROMISING
 
     We haven’t had an opportunity to read many of the new handbooks being published by school boards around the state, replacing expired teachers union collective bargaining agreements.
     
     But we came across an article in the Sheboygan Press regarding a draft of the new teacher handbook being written in the Sheboygan district. If the proposed new rules being reviewed by the school board are an indication of the kind of changes we’ll see in handbooks across the state, there’s reason to be excited.
     
     For instance, one proposed rule removes seniority as the main criteria for filling open positions within the district, the article said. The district will be allowed to choose the most qualified candidate for a teaching position, based on performance and other relevant qualifications. Seniority will only be used as a tie-breaker when all other factors have been considered.
    
     So the most qualified educators will be given the first crack at open positions in Sheboygan. What a concept! We believe it’s safe to say that the local union would never have allowed this reform to be implemented if it still had full collective bargaining rights.
    
     We were also impressed by a proposed rule that would cut the number of paid days off for teachers from 17 to 12. Teacher absenteeism can lead to huge costs for school districts, particularly when it comes to substitute teachers. Reimbursement for unused days off can also be an expensive burden on school budgets. We assume the new rule will also limit that problem.
    
     We’re certain the Sheboygan union would have fought this change as well. But under Act 10, teachers are once again the employees and elected school boards are in charge. They make the decisions they believe are best for the district and students, and the unions have no power to stop them.
    
     It all bodes well for the future of public education in Wisconsin.
    

Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Boston, Toledo school officials refuse to disclose how much they spend on labor

By Steve Gunn
EAG Communications
    
     BOSTON – The federal government, and every state in the nation that we’re aware of, has enacted public information laws designed to help citizens track government spending.
    
     We at Education Action Group are using those laws to gather information about the high cost of union labor contracts in some of our nation’s largest public school districts.
         
     Our plan is to issue a report from each district, illustrating how much money could be saved if teachers unions would accept a few concessions from their pricey collective bargaining agreements.
     
     A typical school spends 75-80 percent of its entire budget on labor costs, so it’s hard to balance budgets and preserve student programs without reducing those costs.
    
     Officials in most of the school districts promptly accepted our information requests, and are busy completing them to our satisfaction. They did not protest the length of the questionnaires (about 30-40 questions) or ask us to pay any fees.
    
     Unfortunately the same cannot be said for officials in the Boston or Toledo school districts.
    
     In Boston, they asked for a ridiculous fee of $2,000 to answer questions about school district spending. We’re guessing they use their outrageous price scale to discourage citizens from seeking financial information.
    
     Toledo school officials told us that Ohio state law only requires them to provide access to existing documents, and doesn’t force them to add up the cost of anything. Since they don’t have to provide information, they aren’t going to.
    
     So much for financial accountability in those school districts.
    
     It’s amazing that the people who manage these districts want taxpayers to feel bad about their supposed lack of operating funds. That would be easier if the public had any sort of guarantee that school officials know where our tax dollars are going, and are willing to share that information.
    
     But in Boston and Toledo, officials obviously consider public school spending none of the public’s business.
    
Exposing the waste in school spending Read More »
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Michigan Education Association School Board Election Manual

MEA School Board Election Manual – 07

Posted in Daily Updates | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Local union presidents not quite ready for prime time

      As a previous story demonstrates, being the leader of a national teachers union requires a refined skill set. For instance, one must be able to publicly speak the language of education reform, even while thwarting meaningful change at every turn. 

     It’s bad public relations to be appear hostile to taxpayers, reformers and parents. To paraphrase the Beatles, “You’ve got to hide your radicalism away.”

     A couple of local union presidents still need to learn that lesson, if they’re ever going to climb the ranks of Big Labor.  

     In Tennessee, Hamilton County Education Association President Sandy Hughes has come out in favor of only allowing teachers, administrators or school employees to serve on the state or local school board, “because education is so complex.”

     Such an arrangement would be a teacher union’s dream.

     In Illinois, Lake County Federation of Teachers President Mike McGue recently mocked citizens who opposed raising the state income tax by 67 percent as “anti-tax zealots” and “Teabaggers.”

     We appreciate the candor of these two local union presidents, but they must get better at subterfuge if they are ever going to get called up to the Big Leagues.

Posted in Daily Updates | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

NEA throws future teachers under the (school) bus

      The “education experts” that are giving leadership to the National Education Association have come out in favor of tougher testing measures for prospective teachers. The NEA, the nation’s largest labor union, announced last week that it favors “national standards for teacher preparation and licensing.”

     “All teacher candidates should have one full year of teaching residency, and pass a performance-based assessment before entering the classroom,” NEA President Dennis Van Roekel said, according to Education Week.

     The news site reports that the “pilot pre-licensure assessment” would take student outcomes into consideration.

     While we do not support attempts to nationalize the teacher certification process, assessing prospective teachers on classroom effectiveness sounds reasonable to us. So how about using those same tests to evaluate current teachers?

     Sure, says the NEA, but only if such assessments are “developmentally appropriate, scientifically valid and reliable for the purpose of measuring both student learning and a teacher’s performance.”

     Here’s the kicker: “We believe that there are no tests ready to do that,” Segun Eubanks, the director of teacher quality for the union, told the New York Times last July.

     The NEA’s position is this: Tests that measure student achievement are too flawed to use on union members, but they are perfectly suitable to assess college kids who want to become teachers.

We’ve all heard about “last in, first out.” Maybe this union position should be called “get out, stay out.”  

     Hey, union leaders may be hypocrites, but at least they’re consistent in their disrespect for young teachers as second-rate professionals.

Posted in Daily Updates | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

“Edujobs” dollars to pay for teacher bonuses?

      Remember back in August 2010 when Congress passed the $10 billion “Education Jobs Bill” to create or save some 300,000 teaching, police and firefighter jobs?

     Then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the legislation “has a direct relationship to the strength of our communities, the education of our children, the safety of our neighborhoods, the stability of the economy of our states, and really points directly to our prospects for the future.”

     Turns out the “edujobs” bill also has a direct relationship to the bonuses teachers in Tennessee’s Marshall County school district may soon receive.

     Several board members want to use leftover stimulus dollars to hand out one-time bonuses of $500 to teachers and $300 to full-time school staff. They reason that employees have gone without pay raises over the past few years, and the bonuses would help boost morale, reports the Marshall County Tribune.

     Board member Kristen Gold is urging caution.

     “There are so many things we need,” Gold said. “We’ll have to use the fund balance just to maintain where we are.”

     It remains to be seen how the Marshall school board will decide the bonus question. But if you’re like us, you’re probably thinking, “We borrowed $10 billion from China for this?”

Posted in Daily Updates | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment



  • Sign Up for Email Updates




  • EAG Bookstore







  • Newsletters









  • Websites